"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming.
The SIQ for this article will be revealed
Published via the DMIMS School of Epidemiology and Public Health Channel.
interventions, hemifacial microsomia, pain, rehabilitation, physical therapy
Cite this article as: Kamani S, Kasatwar P (September 09, 2022) Physiotherapeutic Rehabilitative Approach in an Adult With Hemifacial Microsomia: A Case Report. Cureus 14(9): e28990. doi:10.7759/cureus.28990
Hemifacial microsomia is described as a congenital defect in which one-half of the face has an insufficient amount of skeletal and soft tissues. Underdeveloped temporomandibular joints, mandibular ramus, masticatory muscles, ears, and anomalies in face nerves and muscles are among the symptoms of this syndrome. We discuss the case of an 18-year-old young adult who has had facial asymmetry and malformation of the right ear from birth, as well as trouble chewing. Prior to surgery, the patient's mouth opening was restricted, and following surgery, the patient reported having trouble chewing and only a superficial mouth opening. A suitable and well-designed physical therapy programme was created for the patient in response to his clinical presentation, focusing on improving mouth opening and range of motion on the affected side. The purpose of this case study is to illustrate the major role therapeutic interventions can play in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
The underdevelopment of the bony jaws and soft tissues above them are the key features of the condition known as hemifacial microsomia; the ear is often, but not always, involved (microtia) [1]. Oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia is another name for HFM. The right side of the body seems to be impacted more frequently than the left, and men are more likely to be afflicted than women (3:2). If it occurs bilaterally, it is almost typically unilateral (70%) and asymmetrical [2].
According to Vento et al., each letter of the abbreviation O.M.E.N.S. represents one of the five key symptoms of HFM. The initials O, M, E, N, and S signify orbital distortion, mandibular hypoplasia, ear abnormalities, nerve involvement and soft tissue insufficiency, respectively. The OMENS system is a very flexible, all-inclusive, and essentially objective method of categorizing the spectrum of anomalies that make up hemifacial microsomia, making it one of the most thorough systems and as a result, most widely used to distinguish hemifacial microsomia. It includes issues with the facial nerve and extracranial structures in addition to skeletal and soft-tissue abnormalities [3-5].
Pruzansky's and Kaban's classifications are the most useful in clinical practice. Pruzansky created a scheme that gave a basic workable mandibular categorization based on three different types of mandibular abnormalities in a classic paper published in 1969. A grade I mandible, according to Pruzansky's method, is a tiny mandible with a normal temporomandibular joint (TMJ). It's basically a normal-shaped tiny mandible with a normal glenoid fossa and well-developed mastication muscles. Pruzansky's grade II mandible has a functional TMJ with a malformed condyle and a short, irregularly shaped ramus. The masticatory muscles are underdeveloped. Pruzansky's grade III mandible lacks the ramus, glenoid fossa, and TMJ - in other words, agenesis of the ramus [5]. The syndrome manifests itself in a variety of ways. There could be microtia or preauricular abnormalities in the ear that may range from severe to mild. In severe cases, it may result in facial palsy and hearing loss, also, ear deformity could be one of the major causes of HFM [6].
Significant facial deformities in HFM instances allow for easy differentiation from other craniofacial conditions. There are currently no universally accepted diagnostic criteria for this illness, despite the fact that multiple studies have demonstrated that either mandibular or ear abnormalities are required features. To rule out hemifacial microsomia, these minimum diagnostic criteria can be utilised: firstly, defects of the ipsilateral mandible and the middle ear; and secondly, a considerable family history or asymmetrical mandibular or ear (external/middle) deformities in conjunction with two or more anomalies that are indirectly related to them [7].
Hemifacial microsomia can be treated surgically and then further treated with orthodontic or orthotic treatment. In the case of hemifacial microsomia, introducing physical therapy measures might be advantageous to the patient [8]. To boost the patient's confidence and make him believe in getting promising results, interventions such as facial proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) to regain functions and actions of facial muscles, range of motion exercises to improve upper limb range of motion, strengthening exercises to improve strength, scar management, education to the patient about the condition, proper care about the condition, and home management could be given to him.
An 18-year-old young adult male student from Pulgaon with an endomorphic build and right-handed dominance complained of trouble swallowing and mouth opening over the right side of his face at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Hospital Sawangi (M), Wardha, for a month before presentation. According to the patient, a previous operation was completed in 2006 in Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital under general anaesthesia wherein costochondral grafting of the right temporal mandibular region was performed to treat his right-side hemifacial atrophy. In 2018, the patient underwent surgery to repair a facial deformity on the right side using a derma-fat graft, remove implants from the right mandibular region using the postage stamp technique on the buccal side, and reconstruct the defect using corticocancellous grafts from the right anterior iliac crest. Additionally, the patient underwent surgery to repair a right lateral cleft lip using primary closure while under general anaesthesia. The patient was scheduled for his third procedure on February 4, 2022, which included a bilateral Le Fort I osteotomy with a right maxilla anti-clockwise rotation by 7 mm, a right-side condylectomy with TMJ replacement, and mandibular body augmentation with specific implants under general anaesthesia. The patient received orthodontic care for one month; he was transferred to the ward for additional treatment the same day after his signs and symptoms were evaluated. To assist the patient regain the function and strength of his facial muscles, physiotherapy was also suggested.
Extra-oral examination findings revealed evidence of deficient maturation on the right portion of the face, which appeared stubby and flattened with bottoming of the cheek, the body, and the ramus of the jaw on the right half compared to the left. This showed facial disproportion. The mandible significantly deviated to the right as the mouth opened and closed. When examined closely, the face exhibited asymmetry and has a smaller vertical and lateral mouth opening. In comparison with the left side, the TMJ movements (chewing, facial expressions) were relatively less on the correct side. The mandible also shows a pronounced deviation to the right. The chin was shifted to the right half of the face. The ear pinna was misshapen and minuscule. Lips were competent and no anomalies in the eyes, nose, mouth, ribs or skin were observed. The results of the intraoral examination show that the mouth opening was around 20 mm. Scar from prior surgery was visible in the retromolar area. Uvula, hard and soft palates were all reported NAD (no abnormality detected). Also, the buccal mucosa, tongue, and floor of the mouth were identified as NAD as well.
Table 1 lists the dates and events of the scheduled surgery, as well as the beginning of physiotherapeutic therapies.
A physiotherapy evaluation was performed on the first postoperative day (POD), and the patient complained of difficulty in mastication, limited upper extremity motions, inflamed areas of the neck, limited mouth opening, and other issues. A well-structured and goal-oriented physiotherapeutic plan was devised with the objective of correcting the patient's difficulties and achieving a functional and stable facial appearance using facial PNF techniques. Facial PNF helps in stimulating weakened facial muscles. It facilitates the action of facial muscles in functional facial movement and expression patterns. Also, it suppresses aberrant muscular activation interfering with the function of the face. At the conclusion of the three-week rehabilitation treatment, the patient was given a properly organized home programme, as shown in Table 2. It also lists the patient's goals, interventions, and regimen. As seen in Figure 1, the patient was given a facial PNF exercise.
Prior to the patient being discharged, the patient underwent a complete examination using outcome measures after the three-week physiotherapeutic intervention programme. The successful outcomes following the rehabilitation protocol are shown in Table 3.
ROM: range of motion; NPRS: Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Following the outcome measurements, the patient's post-rehabilitation assessment was done. Figures 2-3 depict the progression of mouth opening before and after treatment. The progression delineates two complete fingers before treatment and three complete fingers after treatment.
Hemifacial microsomia was first used by Gorlin to refer to patients who had unilateral macrostomia, microtia, and failed mandibular ramus and condyle development [5]. Inadequate component development leads to asymmetrical congenital malformations of the head and face that are produced from the first and second branchial arches, which is the root cause of the HFM phenotypes. Even though "hemifacial" only refers to one-half of the face, the disorder is often bilateral and affects one side of the face more severely than the other in 31% of cases [9].
One of the most used systems for classifying hemifacial microsomia is the OMENS classification. The classifications developed by Pruzansky and Kaban, which classify mandibular anomalies into three categories, are the most frequently employed in medical care [3,5]. Anotia, a deformed pinna, and additional preauricular tags are among the ear anomalies. Because of the underdevelopment of the mandible, maxilla and malar bone, the face flattens. Microsomia can also be linked to a high-arch palate and a malocclusion of the teeth [10]. Only a small number of families have been found to have multiple sick individuals, both sexes, and transmission from male to male over several generations, all of which point to an autosomal dominant inheritance mechanism. The skin, subcutaneous tissues, mastication and expressive muscles, as well as the cranial nerves, may all be affected. Macrostomia is a condition that presents as a full-thickness lateral facial cleft. In severe cases, it may result in facial palsy and hearing loss; also, ear deformity could be one of the major causes of HFM.
This case study highlights the importance of well-structured physical therapy therapies for pain alleviation, improvements in upper limb and cervical motions, and hospitalisation for postoperative patients with hemifacial microsomia. The patient showed significant improvement in mouth movements as well. Early use of the programme following surgery helps the patient recover from its side effects and quickly return to his social life.
Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
Community Health Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Kamani S, Kasatwar P (September 09, 2022) Physiotherapeutic Rehabilitative Approach in an Adult With Hemifacial Microsomia: A Case Report. Cureus 14(9): e28990. doi:10.7759/cureus.28990
Received by Cureus: August 17, 2022 Peer review began: August 27, 2022 Peer review concluded: September 02, 2022 Published: September 09, 2022
© Copyright 2022 Kamani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
ROM: range of motion; NPRS: Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.
This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.
Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
Already have an account? Sign in.
Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.
By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.